The Students who are seeking The Interview Summary Class 12 can fulfill their needs here in this post, The summary has two parts according to the chapter’s need. Read the summary and take it down for your upcoming exams…
The Interview Summary Class 12
Table of Contents
The Interview Summary | The Interview Class 12 Summary
Summary of the chapter “ The Interview”
(PART I):
Interviews have played a crucial role in journalism for 130 years. They have been widely read, and countless individuals have been interviewed. However, there is a difference of opinion regarding their methods and merits. Interviews are seen as a source of truth and a skill or art.
Famous authors have varying views on interviews. Some consider them unwanted intrusions (घुसपैठ) into the lives of celebrities, potentially diminishing (कम करना) their status. V.S. Naipaul believed interviews could be harmful, leading to a loss of privacy. Lewis Carroll found interviews to be horrific, especially when dealing with autograph seekers. Kipling condemned all types of interviews, while his wife viewed them as immoral and akin (के समान) to a physical attack deserving of punishment.
H.G. Wells referred to interviews as ordeals, while Saul Bellow likened them to stifling or killing someone.
Advantages of Interviews:- Interviews serve as valuable communication tools and the best means of obtaining information about contemporaries, according to Denis Bran, who also emphasized their speed. Interviewers today hold unique power and influence.
(PART II):
Umberto Eco, an Italian professor known for his work in semiotics, has gained recognition as a scholar. His body of work includes literary texts, essays, children’s books, and newspaper articles. He became an intellectual superstar with the success of his novel “The Name of the Rose.” Mukund, from “The Hindu,” is the interviewer.
Mukund inquired about how Eco managed to produce so much content. Eco explained that he focused on one task at a time, efficiently eliminating any empty spaces, or “interstices,” from his life. He even composed articles in his mind while waiting for a taxi or elevator.
Mukund asked about Eco’s narrative style, which was described as personal and playful compared to the dull and depersonalized styles of others.
Eco explained that he differed from other professors in his approach. While many professors made hypotheses and then presented conclusions, he preferred to tell the story of his research, including his trials and errors. This narrative aspect made his essays more interesting. Eco also mentioned that he began writing novels by accident when he had some free time.
Mukund expressed surprise that Eco had written more non-fiction (over 20 works) than novels (only 5) yet was known primarily as a novelist. Eco humorously replied that he considered himself a university professor who wrote books on Sundays and preferred academic conferences over meetings of PEN clubs. He acknowledged that novels, which common people could relate to more easily, received more attention from the general public.
Eco discussed the success of his novel “The Name of the Rose,” despite its challenging content focused on metaphysics, theology, and medieval history. He pointed out that people do appreciate difficult novels and that, interestingly, it became a bestseller despite having a relatively small readership. Eco acknowledged that people often preferred light reading, especially when they were tired.
Mukund inquired if the novel’s success was due to its focus on medieval history. Eco admitted that even the publisher was surprised by the novel’s success. It dealt with cathedrals and Latin, which were unfamiliar to American readers. Eco speculated that the novel’s triumph might have been because it rekindled people’s interest in medieval history, but the exact reason for its astounding success remained a mystery.